BOOK: David VON MAYENBURG, ed., Handbuch Zur Geschichte Der Konfliktlösung in Europa, Band I-IV (Cham: Springer, 2020).

(Source: Springer)

Springer is publishing a four-volume work on the history of conflict resolution in Europe.

ABOUT THE BOOK

Das vierbändige Werk „Geschichte der Konfliktregulierung“ wurde von namhaften internationalen Expertinnen und Experten geschrieben und soll als zentrales Referenzmedium für die historische Dimension aller Formen der Streitentscheidung dienen. Der Aufbau orientiert sich an den vier Epochen Antike, Mittelalter, Frühe Neuzeit und 19./20. Jahrhundert. Zugleich wird eine europäische Perspektive eingenommen, die sich sowohl in den einzelnen Kapiteln als auch in speziellen Länderforschungsberichten niederschlägt. Nach einer Einführung in die jeweilige Epoche werden einerseits Konfliktlösungsmodelle und  -institutionen sowie andererseits Kernfragen und Zentralprobleme behandelt. Rechtshistorische Dokumente runden die Darstellung ab.

More info about the four volumes (Volume I Antiquity, Volume II Middle Ages, Volume III Early Modern Era and Volume IV 19^th-20^th century can be found here

(source: ESCLH Blog)

ARTICLE: Jean-Louis HALPERIN, "A German Linkage Between Criminal Law and Law of Nations as Academic Disciplines" (Rechtsgeschichte XXVII (2019), 51-64)

(image source: MPIeR)

First paragraph:

The association of criminal and international law within a German historical context would normally only seem to concern post-1945 law and the path from the Nürnberg trial to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.1 But the point of departure of this study is different and comes at the end of the 18th century: it is the matter of German professors who taught both criminal law (Strafrecht) and the law of nations (Völkerrecht). While Franz von Liszt (1851–1919) is certainly the best known both inside and outside Germany, Ernst-Ferdinand Klein (1744–1810), August Wilhelm Heffter (1796–1880), Franz von Holtzendorff (1829–1899) and, for the lesser part of their careers, Hugo Hälschner (1817–1889), Richard Schmidt (1862–1944), Ernst Beling (1866–1932), Carl Schmitt (1888–1985) and Georg Dahm (1904–1963) all taught both subjects. Moreover, other German professors and philosophers have written about criminal and international law, something rather uncommon in other countries. This surprising association between two subjects that are now separated among different specialists is something particular to Germany, and this phenomenon is likely to be linked with the blossoming of the German-speaking literature about norms and sanctions, including the Vienna School of Law. Whereas criminal law appeared as the model of sanctioned norms, dependent on efficient penalties, the law of nations was for a long time controversial because its norms seemed unsanctioned or imperfectly sanctioned through war. War itself triggered discussions about a period in which some murders – those of the enemies – were licit, whereas other forms of behaviour toward adversaries were considered crimes against the law of nations.

Read the full article (open access) on rechtsgeschichte's website.

CALL FOR NOMINATIONS: Cromwell Foundation Book Prize in American Legal History (DEADLINE: 31 May 2019)

(Source: ASLH.net)

The American Society for Legal History has opened a call for nominations for the Cromwell Book Prize. Here the call:

The William Nelson Cromwell Foundation Book Prize is awarded annually to the best book in the field of American legal history by an early career scholar. The prize is designed to recognize and promote new work in the field by graduate students, law students, post-doctoral fellows and faculty not yet tenured. The work may be in any area of American legal history, including constitutional and comparative studies, but scholarship in the colonial and early national periods will receive some preference. The prize is limited to a first book, wholly or primarily written while the author was untenured. Submission of a book by an author who has previously been awarded a Cromwell Foundation Prize for a dissertation or article must be accompanied by a showing that the book enhances, or differs in subject from, the previous work.

The author of the winning book receives a prize of $5,000. The Foundation awards the prize after a review of the recommendation of the Cromwell Prize Advisory Committee of the American Society for Legal History. The Committee shall consider a book in the year of its copyright date or of its actual publication. However, no book shall be considered for the prize more than once.

To nominate a book, please send copies of it and the curriculum vitae of its author to John D. Gordan, III, Chair of the Cromwell Prize Advisory Committee, and to each member of the Cromwell Book Prize Advisory Committee with a postmark no later than May 31, 2019.

All information can be found at the website of the ASLH

(source: ESCLH Blog)

PRIZE: 2019 Toynbee Prize to Prof. Lauren Benton (Vanderbilt University)

(image source: Toynbee Prize Foundation)

We have the following announcement from the Toynbee Prize Foundation:

Lauren Benton has been named winner of the 2019 Toynbee Prize. Benton is Nelson O. Tyrone, Jr. Professor of History and Professor of Law at Vanderbilt University.
Benton was selected as winner of the Prize by the Toynbee Prize Foundation’s Board of Trustees. Both Dominic Sachsenmaier, President of the Foundation and Chair Professor of Modern China at the University of Göttingen, and Darrin McMahon, Foundation Vice-President and Mary Brinsmead Wheelock Professor of History at Dartmouth College, applauded the choice of Benton. “Lauren Benton has made enormous contributions to the global historical study of empires and international legal systems,” said Sachsenmaier. “We are delighted to award her the 2019 Toynbee Prize for the excellence and broad range of her global historical scholarship.”
The Trustees agreed. Jennifer Pitts, Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago, commented:
Lauren Benton has been an indispensable voice in global history, imperial history, and the history of international law, especially in the lively and ongoing interdisciplinary debate about the formation of the global legal order. She has broken important new ground with each of her books, as well as many articles on subjects from legal pluralism to piracy to the abolition of the slave trade. She has made a uniquely powerful case that the history of international law must take into account not simply the arguments of prominent legal theorists but also the actions and arguments of a host of actors from all over the world, what she has called “vernacular forms of political theory.” Her lively authorial voice, incisive arguments and conceptual innovations, engaging narratives, and remarkable archival work have made her work equally valuable to students and specialists alike.
David Armitage, Lloyd C. Blankfein Professor of History at Harvard University wrote:
Lauren Benton has done more than any other scholar in recent generations to reintegrate global history with legal history. With archival tenacity and broad conceptual sweep, she has used fine-grained microhistory in the service of world-spanning arguments about the tentative distribution of imperial power, the informal elaboration of international law, and the paradoxes of sovereignty in a world unevenly colonized and incompletely decolonized. Her achievements, alone and in collaboration with a wide range of younger scholars, make her an apt and inspirational recipient of the Toynbee Prize.
Jeremy Adelman, Henry Charles Lea Professor of History and Director of the Global History Lab at Princeton University enthused:
Lauren Benton has opened new frontiers for global history. She has challenged us all to rethink how we think about empires by spotlighting the spaces in between, the anomalies, and the fringes as locations of improvisation and development.  She has upended the traditional understandings of law and outlawry in the making of practices of modern sovereignty.  And the breadth of her research is simply astonishing.
Jie-Hyun Lim, Professor of Transnational History and Director of the Critical Global Studies Initiative at Sogang University, Seoul, added that “[b]y investigating “jurisdictional politics,” Lauren Benton has contributed to our understanding of the global legal regime as the palimpsest of historical negotiations between centers and peripheries.”
Benton is the author of four books and editor of three. She is perhaps best known for her three seminal works of comparative legal history: Law and Colonial Cultures: Legal Regimes in World History, 1400–1900 (Cambridge UP, 2002), which was awarded the J. Willard Hurst Prize and the World History Association Book Prize; A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires, 1400–1900 (Cambridge UP, 2010); and, most recently, Rage for Order: The British Empire and the Origins of International Law, 1800–1850 (Harvard UP, 2016), co-written with Professor Lisa Ford. In his review of Law and Colonial Cultures, the late Adam McKeown, former professor of history at Columbia University, hailed the book as “a landmark in the creation of a more complex modern global cultural history built on more than just expansion and resistance, but on a shifting negotiation of power, culture, difference, homogenization, identity, and rights.” [1] Her other books include Invisible Factories: The Informal Economy and Industrial Development in Spain (State University of New York Press, 1990); with Bain Attwood and Adam Clulow, Protection and Empire: A Global History (Cambridge UP, 2017); with Richard Ross, Legal Pluralism and Empires, 1500-1850 (New York UP, 2013); and, with Alejandro Portes and Manuel Castells, The Informal Economy: Studies in Advanced and Less Developed Countries (1989). Benton received her A.B. with a concentration in economics from Harvard University in 1978 and a Ph.D. in anthropology and history from Johns Hopkins University in 1987. Prior to her position at Vanderbilt, she was Julius Silver Professor of History and Affiliated Professor of Law at New York University. She has also taught at Rutgers University, New Jersey Institute of Technology, the University of Washington, Bothell, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
The Toynbee Prize is awarded biennially “for work that makes a significant contribution to the study of global history.” In winning the Prize, Benton joins a distinguished roster of Toynbee Prize recipients, including Natalie Zemon Davis, Dipesh Chakrabarty, Christopher Bayly and, most recently, Jürgen Osterhammel.
Benton will formally accept the Prize and deliver the Toynbee Prize Lecture at the Annual Meeting of the American Historical Association in Chicago, Illinois, in early January 2019. Details of the lecture to follow.

(source: Toynbee Prize Foundation)

BOOK: Stefano ANDRETTA, Stéphane PÉQUIGNOT and Jean-Claude WAQUET (eds.), De l'ambassadeur: les écrits relatifs à l'ambassadeur et à l'art de négocier du Moyen Âge au début du XIXe siècle [Collection de l'École française de Rome, 504] (Rome: École française de Rome, 2015) 650 p. ISBN 978-2-7283-1093-7, € 48.

(image souce: École française de Rome)

The École française de Rome published a collective work on diplomatic writing.

Abstract:

Consacré aux écrits relatifs à l’ambassadeur et à l’art de négocier, ce livre suit au fil d’une vingtaine d’études le long et multiforme travail d’élaboration auquel la figure de l’ambassadeur et l’art de la négociation ont donné lieu, de la genèse de nouvelles formes d’organisation politique à la fin du Moyen Âge jusqu’à l’émergence de la profession diplomatique à la fin du XVIII^e siècle et au XIX^e siècle. Certains des textes examinés, comme les traités de legatis ou le Guide de Martens, présentent une dimension théorique ou pédagogique. D’autres sont des écrits littéraires, des instruments juridiques ou des actes de la pratique où se lit, de façon plus ou moins incidente, une réflexion sur les envoyés diplomatiques et l’art qu’ils mettaient en œuvre. Qu’ils aient été composés pour accréditer une fonction, défendre des privilèges, forger des modèles de comportement ou transmettre à de futurs praticiens les leçons de l’expérience, ces textes montrent comment, des docteurs médiévaux aux professeurs du XIX^e siècle, en passant par les humanistes et les négociateurs du Grand Siècle, la figure de l’ambassadeur et les règles de son art ont été sans cesse construites et reconstruites. Aussi, à travers l’étude de ce vaste corpus, ce livre invite à un parcours dans les savoirs de la diplomatie, de l’ambaxiator médiéval aux lendemains du Congrès de Vienne.

On the editors:

- Stefano Andretta, ancien chercheur au CNR et à l’Université Rome I « La Sapienza », est actuellement professeur titulaire d’histoire moderne et d’histoire des États italiens pré-unitaires à l’Université Rome III (Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici).

- Stéphane Péquignot, agrégé d’histoire, ancien élève de l’École Normale Supérieure et ancien membre de la Casa de Velázquez, est docteur en histoire et maître de conférences à l’École Pratique des Hautes Études (Paris).

- Jean-Claude Waquet, ancien élève de l’École des Chartes et ancien membre de l’École Française de Rome, a été professeur aux Universités de Strasbourg et Paris 12. Il est directeur d’études à l’École Pratique des Hautes Études (Paris).

Table of contents here.

Introduction available here.

(source: École française de Rome)

WORKSHOP: The History and Theory of Treaty-Making with Indigenous Peoples (London, Queen Mary, 22 October 2014)

(image source: International Law Reporter)

 International Law Reporter announced a workshop on "Treaty-Making with Indigeneous Peoples", organised by the Centre for Law and Society in a Global Context at Queen Mary University (London), on Tuesday 22 October 2014.

The organisers describe their topic as follows:

The issue of indigenous peoples and treaties is one of the most interesting and intriguing questions of international law. The 2007 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples mentions in several places of its Preamble and in Article 37 rights granted by ‘treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements between States and indigenous peoples are, in some situations, matters of international concern, interest, responsibility and character.’ The workshop will analyse the legacy of these historical treaties with indigenous peoples. It will also assess whether these instruments can play a role in fostering the rights of indigenous peoples within States at a present time.

 More information on Queen Mary's website.