ESIL Interest Group History of International Law

ESIL Interest Group History of International Law

Thursday, 31 May 2018

JOURNAL: Call for Papers 'History of International Law' (Revista de Direito Internacional/Brazilian Journal of International Law 2018/3) (ISSN 2237-1036)

(image source: IL Reporter)

The Brazilian Journal of International Law (RDI) invites submissions for a special issue on History of International Law. The issue will be edited by Professors Arthur Giannattasio (Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo), Olivier Descamps (Université Panthéon-Assas, Paris), Suleiman Mourad (Smith College, Northampton) and Mohammed Hocine Benkheira (École Pratique des Hautes Études, Paris).

Submissions on all aspects concerning the History of International Law are welcome. The following themes can be considered as general guidelines for submissions:

1. History of International Law beyond Facts and Norms: A methodological or an epistemological approach?
2. The Role of History for Critical Analysis of International Law
3. International law and its practice in historical perspective in Brazil
4. International Law and its Histories: Dealing with Eurocentrism
5. Histories of empire, colonialism, slavery, intervention and international law
6. The Role of Religions in International Law History
7. Contributions of Islamic Law to Medieval, Modern and Contemporary International Legal Orders
8. Muslim countries between Islamic Law, National Law and International Law
9. The intertwinement between European, Islamic and Chinese international legal traditions and its impact for the development of International Law in History
10. Excluded Scholarship in International Law: Unravelling the Contributions from Unknown Female and Male International Legal Scholars
11. International Law and its Myths: lex mercatoria and medieval lex mercatoria, war and peace, international economic law, international human rights law, international criminal law, international environmental law, international humanitarian law, among others
12. Globalization and its aftermath on International Law (histories of fragmentation, constitutionalism and regionalism)
13. Patrimonial situation and Personal situation

· THE JOURNAL

The Brazilian Journal of International Law is a double-blind peer-reviewed journal which publishes academic papers related to issues addressed by public and private international law. Ranked by the Brazilian National Counsel of Technological and Scientific Development as Qualis A1 in Law, RDI is becoming an important academic asset in the quest for development and construction of critical views about international law. 

· SUBMISSION PROCESS
Manuscripts may be submitted in English, French, Portuguese, or Spanish. Articles in English are strongly recommended. Manuscript revisions will be in the language of submission. Non-native speakers are strongly encouraged to have their paper read by a native speaker. The Journal will reject articles if the level of chosen language is insufficient. 
It adopts a double-blind peer-review policy. The response from the first review will normally be provided within 30 days from the submission. Authors are expected to correct and return proofs of accepted articles within 10 days.
Authors should preferably hold a PhD and/or have a strong professional/academic background in International Law and History of International Law at the time of submission. The editors will reject manuscripts before review if they are not suitable for the journal, e.g. because of inadequate or imprecise analytical development, inconsistent formatting or non-compliance with our submission guidelines, and poor writing style (this list is not exhaustive).
Deadline for final version: 30 September 2018.
· COPYRIGHT 

All content published by the Journal, except where identified, is licensed under a Creative Commons attribution-type BY-NC. This will ensure the widest dissemination and protection against copyright infringement of articles. The “article” is defined as comprising the final, definitive, and citable Version of Scholarly Record, and includes: (a) the accepted manuscript in its final and revised form, including the text, abstract, and all accompanying tables, illustrations, data; and (b) any supplemental material. 
As an author, you are required to secure permission to reproduce any proprietary text, illustration, table, or other material, including data, audio, video, film stills, and screenshots, and any supplemental material you propose to submit. This applies to direct reproduction as well as “derivative reproduction” (where you have created a new figure or table that derives substantially from a copyrighted source). The reproduction of short extracts of text, excluding poetry and song lyrics, for the purposes of criticism may be possible without formal permission on the basis that the quotation is reproduced accurately and full attribution is given.
· MANUSCRIPT STRUCTURE
Complete guidelines for preparing and submitting your manuscript to this journal are provided below.
The Journal considers all manuscripts on the strict condition that they have not been submitted elsewhere, that they have not been published already, nor are they under consideration for publication or in press elsewhere. Contributions must report original research and will be subjected to review by referees at the discretion of the Editorial Committee. 
- GENERAL GUIDELINES
· Manuscripts should be written in Times New Roman, size 12, space between lines 1.5 throughout the manuscript (including all quotations, endnotes and references).
· Pages should be numbered consecutively.
· Notes should be listed consecutively at the end of the article (endnotes), and clearly marked in the text at the point of punctuation by superior numbers. Endnotes should be used for clarification purposes only.
· Manuscripts must be submitted in Word format (.doc). PDF files will not be accepted.
· All the authors of a paper must attach their short curriculum vitae (CV), which must consist of a single one paragraph-text of 100-120 words in length, each. This is to be done online during the submission process.
· The affiliations of all named co-authors should be the affiliation where the research was conducted. If any of the named co-authors moves affiliation during the peer review process, the new affiliation can be given as a footnote. Please note that no changes to affiliation can be made after the article is accepted.
· All manuscripts submitted should be free from jargon and be written as clearly and concisely as possible. Non-discriminatory language is mandatory. Sexist or racist terms must not be used. 
· All submissions should be made online via http://www.publicacoesacademicas.uniceub.br/index.php/rdi/user/register 
- FORMAT
Articles should be based on original research and develop an original argument falling within the scope of the journal. The articles are subjected to a blind-peer review and must include:
· Title
· Abstract of up to 200 words
· 5-7 keywords
· Main text
· References (at the end of the article)
· Footnotes
· Acknowledgements (if appropriate)
· Table(s) and Figure(s) with caption(s) (on individual files) (if appropriate)

· FURTHER INFORMATION 

For questions regarding the content of this special issue, please contact: 

Professor Dr. Nitish Monebhurrun — Editor of the Brazilian Journal of International law
nitish.monebhurrun@gmail.com

Professor Dr. Arthur Giannattasio – Guest Editor
1147031@mackenzie.br

Professor Dr. Olivier Descamps - Guest Editor
Olivier.Descamps@u-paris2.fr

Professor Dr. Suleiman Mourad - Guest Editor
smourad@smith.edu

Professor Dr. Mohammed Hocine Benkheira – Guest Editor
hocine.benkheira@ephe.sorbonne.fr

(source: International Law Reporter)

Tuesday, 29 May 2018

BOOK: Eric SCHNAKENBOURG (dir). Les entrées en guerre à l’époque moderne XVIe-XVIIIe siècle [CRHIA - Enquêtes & Documents, vol. 61] (Rennes: PURennes, 2018), 178 p. ISBN 978-2-7535-7448-9, € 22

(image source: PURennes)

Book abstract:
Si les sorties de guerre ont déjà été l’objet de travaux et de rencontres scientifiques, le basculement inverse a, en revanche, été peu étudié jusqu’à présent. En effet, les historiens ont l’habitude d’enfermer les périodes de conflits entre la date de déclaration de guerre et celle de la conclusion de la paix. Il s’agit ici de réfléchir aux passages de la paix à la guerre pour savoir comment, à l’époque moderne, les États, les sociétés et les individus sont saisis par l’épreuve du conflit armé.
Table of contents here.

More information with the publisher.

BOOK: Pierre-Marie DUPUY, Ordre juridique et désordre international [Doctrines] (Paris: Pedone, 2018), 377 p. ISBN 9782233008763, € 42

(image source: Pedone)

Book abstract:
Comment comprendre l’architecture du droit international qui repose sur de grands principes unificateurs gardés par le juge international, mais embrasse une multitudes de normes et systèmes qui tendent au contraire à le fragmenter ? Tel est l’un des principaux sujets de réflexion de Pierre-Marie Dupuy qu’on trouve développé dans plusieurs articles de ce recueil qui révèlent une constance admirable que son Cours général à l’Académie de droit international avait mise en évidence et qui justifient le titre de cet ouvrage qui, cependant, ne se limite pas, loin de là, à ce questionnement mais offre au lecteur un florilège d’écrits qui relèvent tant de la technique que de la théorie, de l’histoire et de la philosophie du droit. Il y a en somme une unité de pensée de l’auteur dans la diversité de ses objets d’attention et analyses. Un autre facteur d’unité remarquable est le fait que l’auteur n’entend pas, ni n’a jamais entendu, s’enfermer dans une étude purement juridique du seul univers juridique international. Trop conscient que, s’il existe bien un ordre juridique international, le monde est plongé dans un désordre politique international, Pierre-Marie Dupuy ne cesse de réfléchir à cette inadéquation entre cet ordre juridique et ce désordre politique, entre une promesse de paix et d’humanité et la prévalence des conflictualités. Il s’agit de montrer, d’une part, que celle-ci n’est pas si importante que certains se plaisent à le dire, le droit international s’adaptant à ce qui lui est extérieur, et surtout d’accepter de traiter le droit international pour ce qu’il est, un système dont l’efficacité est tributaire de facteurs qui lui sont extérieurs et de l’analyser au regard de ceux-ci. Pierre-Marie Dupuy n’a jamais pu se contenter de décrire le droit international, mais invite toujours à le comprendre sans hésiter à le critiquer et simultanément à en découvrir les promesses. Et s’il veut croire à ces dernières, passant incessamment du monde des idées à celui de la pratique, l’auteur reste lucide et montre leurs limites, comme pour mieux les dépasser.
On the author:
 Pierre-Marie Dupuy est membre de l’Institut de droit international et professeur émérite de l’Université Paris 2 Panthéon-Assas. Il a été professeur dans diverses universités étrangères, en particulier à l’Institut universitaire européen de Florence ainsi qu’à l’Institut de hautes études internationales et du développement à Genève. Auteur de nombreux ouvrages, il a parallèlement exercé une très riche activité de praticien. La Manley Hudson Medal lui a été décernée en 2015 par l’American Society of International Law.
Table of contents here.

ARTICLE: Anne-Charlotte MARTINEAU, "A Forgotten Chapter in the History of International Commercial Arbitration: The Slave Trade's Dispute Settlement System" Leiden Journal of International Law XXXI (2018), Nr. 2, 219-241

(image source: Cambridge Core)

Abstract:
This article is part of the ongoing efforts to write a critical history of international arbitration in commercial and investment matters. It examines the ways in which the Spanish crown and its concessionaries set up a mechanism to settle legal disputes pertaining to the transatlantic slave trade. The transformation of asientos de negros from limited royal contracts to large-scale monopolies awarded to foreign chartered companies during the sixteenth, seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries was accompanied by the creation of an international commercial arbitration system. Why was this system set up, how did it work, and what was its faith? The overall aim of the article is to invite international lawyers to rethink the history of international arbitration and pay closer attention to the ‘private’ dimensions of formal and informal imperialism. It also attempts to bridge the historical investigation and contemporary commentary. In the conclusion, I argue that this study allows us, in a mirroring effect, to question the idea that today's dispute settlement mechanism was conceived as a means to ‘depoliticize’ international investment law. What the introduction of arbitration achieves is to place some fundamental questions out of sight. Today, as in the past, arbitrators work from within the system; their work rests on a series of unspoken – and yet highly political – premises about the organization of economic life and the distribution of values.
More information here or https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156518000158.

ARTICLE: Felix LANGE, "The dream of a völkisch colonial empire: international law and colonial law during the National Socialist era", London Review of International Law V (2017), no. 3 (Nov), 343-369

(image source: Oxford Journals)

Felix Lange (HU Berlin) publised "The dream of a völkisch colonial empire: international law and colonial law during the National Socialist era" in the third issue of the fifth volume of the London Review of International Law (pp. 343-369).

Abstract:
Among the foreign policy goals of National Socialist Germany was the recovery of the former German colonies. Supporters of the colonial cause made frequent use of international law, and colonial law experts designed laws for the imagined völkisch colonial empire. This article contextualises the academic discourse on international law and colonial law in the political debates of the time.
More information here or on https://doi.org/10.1093/lril/lry004.

(source: International Law Reporter)

BOOK: Tom RUYS, Olivier CORTEN & Alexandra HOFER (eds.), The Use of Force in International Law. A Case-Based Approach (Oxford: OUP, 2018), 960 p. ISBN 9780198784364, 49,99 GBP

(image source: OUP)

Book abstract:
The international law on the use of force is one of the oldest branches of international law. It is an area twinned with the emergence of international law as a concept in itself, and which sees law and politics collide. The number of armed conflicts is equal only to the number of methodological approaches used to describe them. Many violent encounters are well known. The Kosovo Crisis in 1999 and the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 spring easily to the minds of most scholars and academics, and gain extensive coverage in this text. Other conflicts, including the Belgian operation in Stanleyville, and the Ethiopian Intervention in Somalia, are often overlooked to our peril. Ruys and Corten's expert-written text compares over sixty different instances of the use of cross border force since the adoption of the UN Charter in 1945, from all out warfare to hostile encounters between individual units, targeted killings, and hostage rescue operations, to ask a complex question. How much authority does the power of precedent really have in the law of the use of force?
Table of contents:
 1: Introduction, Tom Ruys, Olivier Corten, and Alexandra Hofer
2: The Caroline Incident - 1837, 
Michael Wood
1 - The Cold War Era (1945-1989)

3: The Korean War - 1950-1953, 
Nigel White
4: The Suez Canal Crisis - 1956, 
Alexandra Hofer
5: The Soviet Intervention in Hungary - 1956, 
Eliav Lieblich
6: The U-2 incident - 1960, 
Ki-Gab Park
7: The Belgian Intervention in The Congo - 1960 and 1964, 
Robert Kolb
8: The Indian Intervention in Goa - 1961, 
Tom Ruys
9: The Cuban Missile Crisis - 1962, 
Alexander Orakhelashvili
10: The Gulf of Tonkin Incident - 1964, 
Douglas Guilfoyle
11: The US Intervention in the Dominican Republic - 1965, 
Christian Walter
12: The Six Day War - 1967, 
John Quigley
13: The Intervention in Czechoslovakia - 1968, 
Gerhard Hafner
14: The USS Pueblo Incident - 1968, 
Wolff Heintschel von Heinegg
15: The Indian Intervention into (East) Pakistan - 1971, 
Dino Kristiotis
16: The Yom Kippur War - 1973, 
François Dubuisson and Vaios Koutroulis
17: Turkey's intervention in Cyprus - 1974, 
Oliver Dörr
18: The Mayaguez Incident - 1975, 
Natalino Ronzitti
19: The Entebbe Raid - 1976, 
Claus Kreß and Benjamin K. Nußberger
20: The Larnaca Incident - 1978, 
Constantine Antonopoulos
21: The Vietnamese Intervention in Cambodia - 1978, 
Gregory H. Fox
22: The Ugandan-Tanzanian War - 1978-1979, 
Kenneth Chan
23: Operation Litani - 1978, 
Myra Williamson
24: The Lebanon War - 1982, 
Myra Williamson
25: The Soviet Intervention in Afghanistan - 1979-1980, 
Georg Nolte and Janina Barkholdt
26: The US Hostage Rescue Operation in Iran - 1980, 
Mathias Forteau and Alison See Ying Xiu
27: The Iran-Iraq War - 1980-1988, 
Andrea de Guttry
28: Israel's Air Strike Against Iraq's Osiraq Nuclear Reactor - 1981, 
Tom Ruys
29: The US Intervention in Nicaragua - 1981-1988, 
Jörg Kammerhofer
30: The Falklands/Malvinas War - 1982, 
Etienne Henry
31: South African Incursions into Lesotho - 1982, 
Theresa Reinold
32: The US Intervention in Grenada - 1983, 
Nabil Hajjami
33: The Israeli Raid Against the PLO Headquarters in Tunis - 1985, 
Erin Pobjie, Fanny Declercq, and Raphaël Van Steenberghe
34: The Killing of Khalil al-Wazir by Israeli Commandos in Tunis - 1988, 
Erin Pobjie, Fanny Declercq, and Raphaël Van Steenberghe
35: The US Strikes Against Libya - 1986, 
Maurice Kamto
36: The US Intervention in Panama - 1989, 
Nicholas Tsagourias
2 - The Post-Cold War Era (1990-2000)

37: The ECOWAS Intervention in Liberia - 1990-1997, 
Ugo Villani
38: The Gulf War - 1990-1991, 
Erika de Wet
39: Intervention in Iraq's Kurdish region and the Creation of the No-Fly Zones in Northern and Southern Iraq - 1991-2003, 
Tarcisio Gazzini
40: The Intervention in Somalia, 
Terry D. Gill and Kinga Tibori-Szabó
41: The Intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina - 1992-1995, 
Pierre Klein
42: The US Air Strike Against the Iraqi Intelligence Headquarters - 1993, 
Paulina Starski
43: The ECOWAS Intervention in Sierra Leone - 1997-1999, 
Susan Breau
44: The US Strikes in Sudan and Afghanistan - 1998, 
Enzo Cannizzaro and Aurora Rasi
45: The Eritrean-Ethiopian War - 1998-2000, 
Sean D. Murphy
46: The Great African War and the Intervention by Uganda and Rwanda in the Democratic Republic of Congo - 1998-2003, 
James A. Green
47: The Kosovo crisis - 1999, 
Daniel Franchini and Antonios Tzanakopoulos
3 - The Post 9/11-Era (2001-)

48: The Intervention in Afghanistan - 2001-, 
Michael Byers
49: The Iraq War - 2003, 
Marc Weller
50: Israeli Air Strikes in Syria - 2003 and 2007, 
Lindsay Moir
51: The Israeli Intervention in Lebanon - 2006, 
Christian J. Tams and Wenke Brückner
52: The Turkish Intervention Against the PKK in Northern Iraq - 2007-2008, 
Kimberley N. Trapp
53: 'Operation Phoenix' - the Colombian Raid Against the FARC in Ecuador - 2008, 
Mónica Pinto and Marcos Kotlik
54: The Conflict in Georgia - 2008, 
Christine Gray
55: Israeli Military Operations Against Gaza: Operation Cast Lead (2008-2009), Operation Pillar of Defense (2012) and Operation Protective Edge (2014), 
Christian Henderson
56: The NATO Intervention in Libya - 2011, 
Ashley Deeks
57: US Extra-Territorial Actions against Individuals: Bin Laden, Al Awlaki, and Abu Khattalah, 
David Kretzmer
58: The Intervention in Côte d'Ivoire - 2011, 
Dire Tladi
59: The Intervention of the Gulf Cooperation Council in Bahrain - 2011, 
Agatha Verdebout
60: The Ethiopian Military Intervention in Somalia - 2011, 
Jean-Christophe Martin
61: The Intervention of France and African Countries in Mali 2013, 
Karine Bannelier and Théodore Christakis
62: Threats of and Actual Military Strikes against Syria - 2013 and 2017, 
Anne Lagerwall
63: The Crisis in Ukraine - 2014, 
Mary Ellen O'Connell
64: The Military Operations against the 'Islamic State' (ISIL or Da'esh) - 2014, 
Olivier Corten
65: The Saudi-Led Military Intervention in Yemen's Civil War - 2015, 
Luca Ferro and Tom Ruys
66: The ECOWAS Intervention in the Gambia - 2016, 
Mohamed S. Helal

More information with OUP.

BOOK: Robert KOLB, International Law on the Maintenance of Peace. Jus Contra Bellum [Principles of International Law Series] (Cheltenham: E. Elgar 2018), 520 p. GBP 103,5

(image source: E. Elgar)

Book abstract:
The law on the use of force in relation to the maintenance of international peace remains one of the most important areas of international law and international relations to date. Rather than simply provide another factual account of the law in this area, this detailed and analytical book seeks to explore its normative aspects. Rooted in public international law, the book provides insight into the historical evolution and sociological environment of this particular branch of law. The competences and practice of the UN and of regional organizations in maintaining peace are examined before the focus is shifted to the inter-State level, the main non-use of force rule and its claimed or recognized exceptions. Robert Kolb analyses each of these rules separately, before concluding with insightful reflections on the current state-of-play and considerations for future developments. Inquiring, yet practical, this book will appeal to students and scholars studying both international law and international relations, particularly with regard to peace and conflict. It will also be of interest to government officials working in the field.
Table of contents:
 Contents: Foreword
PART I General features and historic development of the law of and against war - jus contra bellum
1. General features
2. The historic development of limitations on recourse to force: Main periods in which the jus ad bellum has come under pressure
3. Overview: state of the law in 1939
PART II Powers of the organised collectivity (particularly the UN Security Council)
4. Scheme and structure of the UN Charter 5.
Chapter VII of the Charter: co-ercive powers of the Security Council
5. Executing (through the use of force?) a judgment of the International Court of Justice
6. The exercise of parallel competences by the Security Council and the International Court of Justice
7. The binding character of Security Council decisions under Chapter VII or under Article 94 § 2 of the Charter ; Article 50 of the Charter
8. Classic and robust peacekeeping operations
9. Chapter VII of the Charter and neutrality
PART III The prohibition against the use of force and exceptions for individual States
10. The prohibition against the use of force: Article 2 (4) of the Charter
11. Exceptions to the prohibition against the use of force
12. Peaceful change Bibliography Index