Source: OUP |
We look forward to your participation!
Website of the European Society of International Law's Interest Group on the History of International Law.
Source: OUP |
Source: OUP |
![]() |
After careful deliberation following the procedure outlined in the Call for Nominations, the Evaluation Committee has decided to award the 2024 Article Prize to:
Hanna Eklund (University of Copenhagen)
for her article published in Volume 34 (4) of the European Journal of International Law, entitled
Peoples, Inhabitants and Workers: Colonialism in the Treaty of Rome
The Evaluation Committee would like to congratulate Professor Eklund on the award.
An honourable mention goes to:
Sebastian Spitra
for his article published in Volume 26 (3-4) of the Zeitschrift für Neuere Rechtsgeschichte, entitled
A Short Introduction to Research in the History of International Law: Current State, Contexts and Perspectives
The ESIL IG History of International Law Coordinating Committee would also like to thank its members for their active participation in the nomination process and warmly invites them to participate again in the 2025 edition.
Anastasia Hammerschmied - Florenz Volkaert - Jaanika Erne - Sze Hong Lam
The Journal for Digital Legal History invites submissions for its 2025 issue on the (mis)use and potential of agent-based modelling (ABM) in legal history and legal studies. This issue will explore how computational simulations can serve as heuristic and hermeneutic tools, rather than replacements for “traditional” (however defined) legal research, to illuminate the dynamics of law as a complex system.
Submissions from all fields of law and legal history are welcome. This includes private, public, European, and international law, both contemporary and historical.
Background and Rationale
Agent-based modelling is now “a common and well-established tool in social sciences and certain of the humanities” (Klein, Marx, and Fischbach 2018). Agent-based models construct artificial societies of autonomous “agents” whose simple rules of interaction generate emergent macro-level patterns. Historians are increasingly open to simulation and have thought fairly extensively about the epistemology of ABM (Düring 2014; Gavin 2014).
ABM remains underutilized in law and legal history but offers unique strengths: It can make assumptions explicit, allow for counterfactual “what-if” experiments, and uncover the generative sufficiency of hypothesized mechanisms (Benthall and Strandburg 2021; Schwartz 2020). Legal historians could employ ABM to test theories by simulating alternative sets of legal “rules of the game” and observing the resulting outcomes.
We welcome diverse formats:
Research articles (up to 10000-15000 words) presenting ABM-driven projects.
Technical essays (2000–5000 words) with code snippets, notebooks, or visualizations.
Reflections: Shorter pieces (up to 2000 words) on methodological hurdles, interdisciplinary collaboration, or critiques of ABM.
Trial and error (up to 5000 words): pieces reflecting on failed attempts to implement ABM in a project or grant application, identifying the specific factors or obstacles that led to failure or success.
Deadline: 30 September 2025 (authors can request another timeline in consultation with the editorial board)
Bibliography
Benthall, Sebastian, and Katherine J. Strandburg. 2021. “Agent-Based Modeling as a Legal Theory Tool.” Frontiers in Physics 9. doi:10.3389/fphy.2021.666386.
Düring, Marten. 2014. “The Potential of Agent-Based Modelling for Historical Research.” In Complexity and the Human Experience: Modeling Complexity in the Humanities and Social Sciences, eds. Paul A. Youngman and Mirsad Hadzikadic. CRC Press, 121–37.
Gavin, Michael. 2014. “Agent-Based Modeling and Historical Simulation.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 8(4). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/8/4/000195/000195.html (April 28, 2025).
Klein, Dominik, Johannes Marx, and Kai Fischbach. 2018. “Agent-Based Modeling in Social Science, History, and Philosophy. An Introduction.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 43(1 (163)): 7–27.
Schwartz, Alex. 2020. “Agent-Based Modeling for Legal Studies.” In Computational Legal Studies: The Promise and Challenge of Data-Driven Research, ed. Ryan Whalen. Edward Elgar, 312–27.
More info with the JDLH.
2025 ESIL Annual Conference Reconstructing International Law
Pre-Conference
Workshop:
(De-/re-)constructions of
International Law over Time and Space
Wednesday 10th September 2025, 15:00 to 18:00, Berlin
There has been no agreed-upon definition as to when ‘international
law’ exactly began, but it is generally agreed that (de-/re-)construction has
been a common theme in the history of international law at various times. This
workshop aims to better
understand the theme of ‘reconstructing international law’ from a historical
perspective: (1) What have been the causes and reasons for (re-)constructions
of international law in its history? (2) How has international law fared after
past major systemic crises? (3) What can we learn from institutional and
normative projects of (re-)constructing ‘new’ international law in the past?
Programme
15:00
– 15:05 |
Introduction
and words of welcome (Sze Hong Lam) |
15:05
– 16:15 |
Panel
1: De-/reconstruction through
historical archives |
|
Dr. Ralph Janik (Sigmund Freud
Private University Vienna): Totalitarian International Law Now and Then:
Lessons from the 1940s Dr. Alina Cherviatsova (Ghent University):
The Unrecognized Republic: Ukraine's Struggle for
Independence in the Shadow of the Versailles Treaty |
|
César Targowla (Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne University):
Construction and
Deconstruction of Sovereign Legitimacy During the French Revolution: The
Emergence of a New Concept in International Law, the Government-in-Exile |
|
Moderator: Jaanika Erne (University of Tartu) |
16:15-16:20 |
Break |
16:20-17:10 |
Panel
2: De-/reconstruction of the
history of colonialism and international law |
|
Professor.
dr. Henri de Waele (Radboud
University/ University of Antwerp): “Lie There, My Art.” The
(Re)construction of International Law in the Dutch Colonial Empire, 1919-1940 |
|
Marcel Modest-Massner (University of Vienna): Rethinking the Colonial Imprint: A Dual Lens on the History of International Law |
|
Moderator: Anastasia Hammerschmied (University of Vienna) |
17:10-18:00 |
Panel
3: The spatial de-/reconstruction
of international law |
|
Dr. Milena Mottola (University of Padova): From roads to borders, and back again? International law’s (time)lines |
|
Miguel Rodríguez Vidosa (Tilburg University): The
Place of Territory in Public International Law. An Intellectual History of
Legal Space |
|
Moderator: Dr. Florenz Volkaert (Université Catholique
de Louvain-la-Neuve – Ghent University) |
18:00:18:10 |
Final
remarks (Sze Hong Lam) |
|
|
|
|
Conveners
Anastasia Hammerschmied
– Florenz Volkaert - Jaanika Erne – Sze Hong Lam