ESIL Interest Group History of International Law

ESIL Interest Group History of International Law
Showing posts with label call for papers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label call for papers. Show all posts

Monday, 26 May 2025

CALL FOR PAPERS: Journal for Digital Legal History, "Agent-Based Modelling in Law and Legal History" (DEADLINE: 30 September 2025)

 


2025 Call for Papers: Agent-Based Modelling in Law and Legal History

The Journal for Digital Legal History invites submissions for its 2025 issue on the (mis)use and potential of agent-based modelling (ABM) in legal history and legal studies. This issue will explore how computational simulations can serve as heuristic and hermeneutic tools, rather than replacements for “traditional” (however defined) legal research, to illuminate the dynamics of law as a complex system.

Submissions from all fields of law and legal history are welcome. This includes private, public, European, and international law, both contemporary and historical.

Background and Rationale

Agent-based modelling is now “a common and well-established tool in social sciences and certain of the humanities” (Klein, Marx, and Fischbach 2018). Agent-based models construct artificial societies of autonomous “agents” whose simple rules of interaction generate emergent macro-level patterns. Historians are increasingly open to simulation and have thought fairly extensively about the epistemology of ABM (Düring 2014; Gavin 2014).

ABM remains underutilized in law and legal history but offers unique strengths: It can make assumptions explicit, allow for counterfactual “what-if” experiments, and uncover the generative sufficiency of hypothesized mechanisms (Benthall and Strandburg 2021; Schwartz 2020). Legal historians could employ ABM to test theories by simulating alternative sets of legal “rules of the game” and observing the resulting outcomes.

We welcome diverse formats:

Research articles (up to 10000-15000 words) presenting ABM-driven projects.

Technical essays (2000–5000 words) with code snippets, notebooks, or visualizations.

Reflections: Shorter pieces (up to 2000 words) on methodological hurdles, interdisciplinary collaboration, or critiques of ABM.

Trial and error (up to 5000 words): pieces reflecting on failed attempts to implement ABM in a project or grant application, identifying the specific factors or obstacles that led to failure or success.

Deadline: 30 September 2025 (authors can request another timeline in consultation with the editorial board)

Bibliography

Benthall, Sebastian, and Katherine J. Strandburg. 2021. “Agent-Based Modeling as a Legal Theory Tool.” Frontiers in Physics 9. doi:10.3389/fphy.2021.666386.

Düring, Marten. 2014. “The Potential of Agent-Based Modelling for Historical Research.” In Complexity and the Human Experience: Modeling Complexity in the Humanities and Social Sciences, eds. Paul A. Youngman and Mirsad Hadzikadic. CRC Press, 121–37.

Gavin, Michael. 2014. “Agent-Based Modeling and Historical Simulation.” Digital Humanities Quarterly 8(4). https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/8/4/000195/000195.html (April 28, 2025).

Klein, Dominik, Johannes Marx, and Kai Fischbach. 2018. “Agent-Based Modeling in Social Science, History, and Philosophy. An Introduction.” Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung 43(1 (163)): 7–27.

Schwartz, Alex. 2020. “Agent-Based Modeling for Legal Studies.” In Computational Legal Studies: The Promise and Challenge of Data-Driven Research, ed. Ryan Whalen. Edward Elgar, 312–27.


More info with the JDLH.

Thursday, 13 March 2025

CALL FOR PAPERS: 22nd Annual STOREP Conference, "Economies and Territories: A History of Economics Perspective" (Università degli Studi del Molise, 12-14 June 2025, DEADLINE: 17 March 2025)



Source: STOREP


Description:

ECONOMIES AND TERRITORIES: FROM THE HISTORY OF ECONOMICS PERSPECTIVE

22nd Annual STOREP Conference, June 12-14, 2025

Università degli Studi del Molise
Dipartimento di Bioscienze e Territorio, via Duca degli Abruzzi 67, 86039 Termoli (CB)

Background and rationale

Recent events, from the 2020 pandemic crisis to growing geopolitical instability, accompanied by trade tensions across countries, are prompting a re-evaluation of the spatial and regional dimensions of economic activities. Phenomena such as reshoring, nearshoring, friends-shoring, and the re-discovery of national borders are contemporary examples of Adam Smith’s invisible hand, which ‘encouraged’ merchants to keep their capital at home for greater security, thereby advancing, according to Smith’s metaphor, both their own interests and the public good.

Conflicts, political tensions, and climate change challenges are reshaping the global economy with relevant implications for regional economies, which have been increasingly interconnected through trade, investment, and financial flows. The search for lesser dependence on foreign markets in terms of supply chains and market outlets, particularly with reference to strategic sources such as energy, is today at the center of policymakers’ concerns.

The implications of economies’ interdependence have been widely investigated in the history of economic thought. In the 17th century, the mercantilists focused on the relationships between colonies and the mother country to ensure the power of the latter, while Smith (1776) and David Ricardo (1817) emphasized the advantages for all countries of free trade through international specialization. By contrast, Karl Marx (1848) interpreted the cosmopolitan character of the capitalistic system in terms of the bourgeoisie’s exploitation of the world market with the destruction of national industries by new industries that no longer work up indigenous raw materials.

As well as a territory shapes its economy, the opposite is also true, as in the case of megacities and the increasing urban population and agglomeration economies, as highlighted in Alfred Marshall’s theory (developed in the late 19th century) of industrial districts. Spatial dimensions and economic geography theories focusing on economic clustering and concentration in specific regions have been recently rediscovered by Paul Krugman’s (1991) core-periphery model. The new economic geography he inaugurated has its precursors in Walter Christaller’s central-place theory (1933), Walter Isard’s regional science and industrial location theory (1956), as well as J. Vernon Henderson’s (1956) urban system theory.



The development of industrial centers with respect to rural areas also involved migration phenomena, all of which are related phenomena testifying to the multidimensional connections of territories and economies. New economic geography encompasses the shift in economic and political power and the redistribution of resources and opportunities across regions. Such transformations drive the movement of people from one place to another with a significant impact on the spatial economy in terms of population distribution, and particularly the de-population of some areas, as well as the dynamics of economic development and social and cultural changes. Refugee migration, labor migration, rural-to-urban migration, climate migration, and digital nomadism are among the phenomena that characterize our complex times. The growing disparities across regions are another related topic. Territorial and regional inequalities and the North and South divide are not new. Despite economic policy efforts, from post-World War II planning to recent cohesion policies, significant disparities remain, for example, within Italy and across the European Union countries, also exacerbated by recent geopolitical tensions, thereby raising questions about the economic policy effectiveness.

The 2007 Treaty of Lisbon assigned the European Union the mission of promoting territorial, economic, and social cohesion. Since then, investments in infrastructure, incentives for business development, and initiatives to improve education and training have been implemented. An effort re-affirmed by the European Union post-pandemic funds. The European Union’s Cohesion Fund and the European Regional Development Fund have been instrumental in financing projects that enhance connectivity, innovation, and economic diversification. The European Union’s Recovery and Resilience Facility provides a further significant opportunity to address regional disparities, with Italy, as one of the largest beneficiaries.

Addressing sustainable economic development within this context also requires a focus on environmental and digital transitions alongside efforts to reduce regional inequalities for cohesive growth across Europe.

Territorial dimensions of economic activity and the disparities in economic development across different regions offer numerous insights into addressing economic development problems, regional inequalities, population and migration dynamics, and policies from the history of economics perspective and from an interdisciplinary approach. The core-periphery model, in particular, can be fruitfully applied not only to explain economic development but also to explore boundaries between economics and other social sciences and today’s organization of economics into a mainstream (core) and heterodox (periphery) structure.

Submissions

The 22nd STOREP Annual Conference aims to foster a debate on all the issues related to “Economies and Territories from the History of Economics Perspective”, and welcomes sessions and research papers, framed in a historical or theoretical perspective. The Conference also aims to bring together scholars and leading experts from various fields within the social sciences domain – such as economics and history of economic thought, economic history, sociology, law, demography, and geography – and from diverse regions, with particular encouragement for scholars from the Global South.

Possible focuses of interest include, but are not limited to:
  • Theories and models of regional economics, spatial economics, and economic geography analyzed from the history of economics perspective.
  • The use of territories and spatial dimensions as a metaphor for economic internal organization and its evolution.
  • Historical development of agglomeration economies and their impact on economic theories.
  • The impact of regional economics on policy-making and regional planning over time.
  • Institutional and policy perspectives: the role of institutions in regional economic development; the impact of regional economic policies on economic growth and spatial inequalities.
  • Interdisciplinary studies: demography, migration, geography, sociology, political science contributions on spatial and regional economics.

Paper proposals are welcome in all fields adopting historical and/or theoretical approaches from multiple perspectives (Marxian, Post Keynesian, Neo-Ricardian, Neo Schumpeterian, Institutional, Austrian economics, Stock-flow consistent and agent-based modeling, input-output analysis). Empirical approaches (both quantitative and qualitative) are considered, provided that they are appropriately framed in a historical or theoretical perspective.





Special sessions

We are pleased to announce that
Alessandra Mezzadri (SOAS University of London) is the keynote speaker of the Annual STOREP Conference.

[info on the Keynote lecture here]

Roberto Marchionatti (Università di Torino) will give the ninth “Raffaelli Lecture” (“The Long 20th Century of Economics. A Critical Narrative of a Social Science that Would Be Queen”).

[info on the Raffaelli Lecture here]


STOREP invites proposals for special sessions organized in collaboration with other scientific associations, NGOs, and policy-making institutions. As in the past, the 22nd STOREP Conference will jointly organize initiatives and special sessions with the Institute for New Economic Thinking, the “Young Scholars Initiative”, and with students and researchers of the international network Rethinking Economics.

Proposals, registration, and special issues

Abstract and session proposals must be uploaded on the submission website of the conference – i.e. via the web-based platform “Conference maker”. To submit, please create an account by providing basic contact information and selecting a user ID and password. If you have previously registered for a conference through Conference Maker, you can login with your existing user ID and password. Detailed instructions can be found here. Submitters must add any co-authors after the proposal is submitted, by clicking on “Add/modify authors”.Abstract proposals (including keywords, JEL codes, and affiliation) must not exceed 400 words

Session proposals should include the abstract of all three/four scheduled papers

Registration: All participants are required to become STOREP members or renew their membership. Detailed instructions can be found here.

The Review of Political Economy (ROPE) will consider selected papers presented at the STOREP Conference for publication. Participants are required to submit their papers to ROPE within six months after the Conference. Manuscripts submitted through this procedure will undergo the standard peer review process. STOREP is also pleased to announce that several academic journals have expressed interest in publishing Conference papers.

Important dates

March 17, 2025: Deadline for abstracts and sessions submission
April 14, 2025: Notification of abstract and session acceptance or rejection
May 5, 2025: Deadline for early registration

May 20, 2025: Deadline for submitting full papers and for becoming Members
June 11, 2025: YSI pre-conference
June 12-14, 2025: 21st STOREP Annual Conference

Important dates for young scholars: Scholarships and Awards (details below)
March 20, 2025: Deadline for submission of Curriculum Vitae and an extended abstract
April 2, 2025: Deadline for submitting the final papers for Scholarships
May 10, 2025: Results of the evaluation process
December 31, 2025: Deadline for submitting articles for Young STOREP Awards

Registration fees

STOREP Members
(early registration) by May 12: 160€
(late registration) after May 12: 230€

Others
(early registration) by May 12: 220€ (annual membership included)
(late registration) after May 12: 300€ (annual membership included)

Young scholars (non-tenured, under 40)
STOREP members: 100€
others: 130€ (annual membership included)



Young Scholars Awards

(1) STOREP provides two Awards of 1000€ each (so as to make it possible to reward both history-of-economic-thought articles and more policy-oriented papers) for the best articles presented at the Annual Conference by young scholars under 40 years of age. Applications, including CV and the final version of the papers, must be sent to segretario@storep.org by December 31, 2025. Only papers co-authored by a maximum of two researchers, both meeting the eligibility criteria for ‘Young’ scholars, are eligible for the Award. Previous award winners from any of the three preceding rounds are not eligible to apply. Papers must not have been previously published or under review in a scholarly journal at the time of the conference.

(2) Scholarships for young scholars (under 40 years of age, non-tenured). In order to be eligible, the applicant is required to send to segretario@storep.org a Curriculum Vitae and an extended abstract (2,000 words ca.) on any topic relevant to the history of political economy, by March 20, 2025. The final version of the papers must be uploaded by April 2, 2025. Applicants will be notified of the evaluation process no later than May 10, 2025. Winners will be awarded free STOREP Conference registration, including the association’s annual membership fee and, if possible, a lump-sum contribution towards travel and accommodation expenses.

More info with the Italian Society for the History of Political Economy.


Tuesday, 11 March 2025

CALL FOR PAPERS: Society for Legal and Institutional History of Flanders, Picardy and Wallonia, "Extraterritoriality and the Law / L'Extraterritorialité et le droit" (Tilburg University, 30-31 May 2025, DEADLINE: 20 April 2025)

Description:
The Society for Legal and Institutional History of Flanders, Picardy and Wallonia holds its annual "International days" 2022 on 30 and 31 May 2025 in Tilburg (in The Netherlands)

The theme of the conference is: « l’Extraterritorialite et le Droit » (“Extraterritoriality and Law”)

The law as it stands, both public and private, has strong ties to a territory. For example, territory is fundamental in the constitutional order of France, Belgium and the Netherlands. In private law, this attachment to land is equally present. Conflicts in property law are judged by the lex situs. The constitutio Antoniniana (D.1.5.17) did the same for Roman citizenship. National law, comparative law and legal history are based and strongly focused on that national, territorial order, as well in Picardy, Wallonia, in Flanders, as anywhere.

Territorial validity contrasts sharply with the (also normative) dynamics of persons and their transactions across borders, and it contrasts sharply with an ideal of universal law. This congress focuses on all forms of extraterritoriality of law, and its possible explanations. It provides an opportunity to address topics such as the genesis and legitimacy of universally applicable law (natural law, ius commune, human rights), genesis and legitimacy of territorially applicable law (local or national norms, customary law), the adoption or non-adoption of concepts, norms, systems or arguments from elsewhere, in occasional or institutionalized collaborations. Colonial relations are also of great importance in the latter context and deserve attention.

This general theme does not exclude papers about other subjects regarding legal history or institutional history.

Presentations can be held in French, English or Dutch. Speakers have to send a summary to the organization (preferably in French and/or English).

Proposals can be sent before 20 April 2025 to J.M. MILO and E.G.D. van Dongen, j.m.milo@uu.nl; E.G.D.vanDongen@uu.nl

---


Société d'histoire du droit et des institutions

des pays flamands, picards et wallons

(fondée à Lille en 1929)


Journées internationales d'histoire du droit et des institutions

Tilbourg (Pays-Bas), 30 et 31 mai 2025

Les journées internationales d'histoire du droit et des institutions 2025 auront lieu à Tilbourg (Tilburg), 30 et 31 mai 2025 et seront consacrées au thème de L’extraterritorialite et le Droit.

Le droit applicable, qu'il soit public ou privé, est fortement lié à un territoire. Par exemple, le territoire est fondamental dans l'ordre constitutionnel de la France, de la Belgique et des Pays-Bas. En droit civil, Ce rattachement au territoire est tout aussi manifeste. Les conflits en matière de droit des biens sont jugés selon la lex situs. La constitutio Antoniniana (D.1.5.17) a fait de même pour la citoyenneté romaine. Le droit national, le droit comparé et l'histoire du droit sont basés et fortement axés sur cet ordre géographique national, que ce soit en Picardie, en Wallonie, en Flandre, ou ailleurs.

Cette territorialité du droit contraste fortement avec la `dynamique normative’ des personnes et de leurs transactions transfrontalières, ainsi qu'avec l'idéal d'un droit universel. Ce congrès se concentre sur toutes les formes d'extraterritorialité du droit, et sur les motifs de cette extraterritorialité. Il permet d'aborder des sujets tels que la genèse et la légitimation du droit universellement applicable (droit naturel, ius commune, droits de l'homme), la genèse et la légitimation du droit territorialement applicable (normes locales ou nationales, droit coutumier) et l'adoption ou la non-adoption de concepts, de normes, de systèmes ou d'arguments venus d'ailleurs, dans le cadre de collaborations occasionnelles ou institutionnalisées. Dans ce dernier contexte, les relations coloniales revêtent également une grande importance et méritent l'attention.

Ce thème général n’exclut pas, par ailleurs, la possibilité de communiquer sur d’autres sujets d’histoire du droit, de la justice et des institutions.

Les interventions peuvent être faites en français, en anglais ou en néerlandais. Les orateurs sont priés d’envoyer un résumé à l’avance aux organisateurs (de préférence en français).

Les personnes désireuses de communiquer sont priées de faire parvenir leur proposition de communication avant le 20 avril 2025 à J.M. MILO et E.G.D. von Dongen par courriel: j.m.milo@uu.nl; E.G.D.vanDongen@uu.nl

Source: VUB Core

CALL FOR PAPERS: XXIXth Annual Forum for Young Legal Historians, "Compromis à la belge - The Role of Compromise in Legal History" (Ghent University, 17-20 September 2025, DEADLINE: 18 April 2025)

XXIXth Annual Forum for Young Legal Historians, "Compromis à la belge - The Role of Compromise in Legal History" 

Belgians often refer to the bric-a-brac solutions that the country’s lawmakers come up with as ‘compromis à la belge’ – Belgian compromises. They are never pretty, often incomprehensible, but somehow work. It is only fitting therefore that the next Annual Forum of the Association of Young Legal Historians, taking place in Ghent, Belgium, should seek to explore the role of compromise in legal history. We want to invite young researchers to come together and reflect on the complex interactions between legal institutions, societal norms, and power dynamics that either foster or reject compromise in legal decision-making. Compromise is broadly defined as any agreement where parties relinquish part of their demands. Participants are encouraged to examine its applications across different contexts, from individual disputes to institutional negotiations, and from idealized notions to ad hoc resolutions. The conference will also consider frameworks that facilitate compromise, as well as decision-making processes that explicitly reject it. Panel discussions will be structured around thematic rather than geographical or historical divisions. Possible topics include:

 • Ethical dimensions of compromise in law, including its impact on marginalized groups, human rights, and governance. 

• The role of stakeholders in legal decision-making, such as social partners and interest groups.

 • When and how compromise enhances or undermines legal legitimacy.

 • Institutions that mediate compromise, such as arbitrators, mediators, and justices of the peace. Legal history is inherently interdisciplinary, intersecting with both law and history. 

The increasing diversity of the field, incorporating extra-European legal traditions alongside traditional Roman and Ancien Régime studies, necessitates new ways of fostering dialogue. By selecting a theme that allows in-depth case studies without cultural bias, the conference seeks to contribute to the emerging field of global legal history. Rather than organizing panels based on geographic or historical categories, the conference will emphasize thematic connections to stimulate discussion across subfields that seldom engage with one another. This approach is designed to generate fresh insights and new research directions in legal history. 

We invite scholars to contribute to this exploration of compromise in legal history, bridging disciplinary gaps and fostering a dynamic exchange of ideas. 

Practical information 

If you would like to present a paper during the conference, please send an application including an abstract of not more than 250 words and your CV to aylhforum2025@gmail.com before 18 April 2025. 

Acceptance letters will be sent out by the end of May. It is also possible to apply for a full panel. In that  case, your proposal should also include, in addition to individual paper proposals, an abstract introducing the theme of the panel. Presentations have to be in English and should not exceed 15 minutes each. Since one of the primary goals of the conference is to allow young researchers to get to know each other personally, we only accept presentations in person. The conference fee will be € 180 and does not include accommodation. Further information about the upcoming forum can be found at the website of the conference. Information about the Association of Young Legal Historians and the past Annual Forums is available at the AYLH-website. Participants who are interested will also be invited to send in an article after the conference that will be published in a volume of conference proceedings, which will include the individual articles and concluding remarks in which we will highlight commonalities of content and challenges faced.  We look forward to receiving your abstracts and we will uncompromisingly endeavor to provide a conference that is both academically and socially fulfilling.  

The organizing committee,  

Amber Gardeyn Pieterjan Schepens Jasper Van de Woestijne 

Consult the call here or via the Association's website.


Monday, 10 March 2025

CALL FOR PAPERS: "Cooperation or Domination: International Organisations as Imperial Designs" (The Center for Global Public Law at Koç University, 4 July 2025, DEADLINE: 23 March 2025)


Cooperation or Domination: International Organisations as Imperial Designs



The Center for Global Public Law (CGPL) at Koç University is pleased to announce a Workshop to be held in Istanbul on 4 July 2025. The workshop will focus on the intersection between international organisations and imperialism, capitalism and race exploring whether and how these institutions have served as instruments of domination under the guise of cooperation. Each paper will be assigned a discussant who will provide detailed feedback, fostering an in-depth discussion and critique of the presented work. Discussants include Catherine Brölmann (University of Amsterdam), Jean d’Aspremont (Sciences Po, University of Manchester), Lys Kulamadayil (Geneva Graduate Institute), and Fuad Zarbiyev (Geneva Graduate Institute). Scholars at all stages of their careers, including PhD students, junior and senior academics, are invited to submit abstracts.

Workshop Theme

International law has long functioned as a hegemonic tool, enabling actors to impose their political, legal, and cultural values on others through legal vocabulary. It that respect, it is well-document that European imperialism is intrinsic to the formation of international law which proclaims to be universal. This legacy persists beyond the era of formal colonisation, as international organisations have increasingly become key instruments in shaping the global order where imperialist practices have not ended with decolonisation. These organisations, often presented as platforms for dialogue, negotiation, and cooperation, have played a pivotal role in transforming member and non-member states by imposing values and principles that reflect the interests of dominant powers. International organisations have simultaneously perpetuated some imperialist geographies and configurations of the world order. They have played a key role in entrenching global inequalities by promoting specific economic policies that disproportionately harm the Global South. Further, the voting rights, representation, decision-making are only some of the practices that sustain racial inequalities. This workshop aims to critically examine the ways in which international organisations perpetuate hierarchies, racial inequalities, and forms of imperialism and capitalism, to carve their own zone of control and domination. At the same time, it will question whether international organisations can be a site of resistance to such imperial practices.

Recent political shifts redefine the role of international organisations in the international legal order. Events such as the expulsion of Russia from the Council of Europe, NATO’s expansion with Finland and Sweden, Brexit, and the rise of organisations like BRICS exemplify this reconfiguration. These developments invite renewed scrutiny of how international organisations mediate power dynamics in a multipolar world. In this evolving landscape, questions of imperialism, capitalism and race are no longer confined to the legacies of European colonial powers. The influence of China, India, and Russia challenges the traditional dominance of the Global North and calls for a critical reassessment of how international organisations shape the global order.

We invite submissions addressing, but not limited to, the following themes:
  • The relationship of international organisations with imperialism, capitalism and race in post-colonial contexts
  • Universalism versus particularism: the imposition of values through international organisations
  • Theoretical approaches to understanding international organisations as instruments of hegemony and capitalism
  • Historical approaches to understanding international organisations and their relationship with imperialism, capitalism and race
  • Regional international organisations and their transformative influence on member states
  • The role of European international organisations in continuing European imperialism
  • Imperial ambitions of non-European organisations and their implications
  • The creation of inequalities and hierarchies through membership and decision-making in international organisations
  • Techniques and tools used by international organisations to enforce transformations on states
  • The lack of transparency, unequal voting rights, and issues of democratic legitimacy in the functioning of international organisations as mechanisms that consolidate the dominance of powerful states
  • Regional human rights courts and their role in promoting specific interpretations of human rights
  • The variety and plurality of imperialist projects at work in the framework of international organisations
  • The potential of universal and regional international organisations as sites of resistance towards other forms of imperialism
  • The convergence of international organisations’ imperialist practices with other forms of imperialism

Submission Guidelines

Abstracts of no more than 500 words should be sent to kuremer@ku.edu.tr by 23 March. Please include your affiliation in the abstract, indicate whether you require funding, and provide a 200-word bio.

Workshop Format

The Workshop will adopt a roundtable format to foster in-depth discussions. Each presentation will be followed by comments from discussants and an open discussion. Participants are expected to read the papers before the Workshop and actively engage in the discussions. Selected papers may be published in a special issue.

Timeline

Deadline for abstract submissions: 23 March
Notification of acceptance: 6 April
Submission of 3.000-word draft papers: 20 June

Funding

Limited funding is available to cover travel and accommodation costs, with priority given to junior scholars and those without institutional financial support.

Organiser

Işıl Aral

Assistant Professor of International Law, Koç University

Director, Center for Global Public Law

This Workshop is funded by the Koç University Seed Research Fund and the Science Academy’s Young Scientist Awards Program.

For inquiries, please contact us at kuremer@ku.edu.tr.

Source: European Society of International Law monthly newsletter - Koç University

Monday, 25 November 2024

CALL FOR PAPERS: Boston Area Colloquium on the History of International Law, "History of International Law Colloquium" (Boston, Spring-Fall 2025, DEADLINE: 31 December 2024)

Description:

The organizers of the Boston area colloquium on the history of international law are pleased to announce a call for papers to be presented during the Spring and Fall of 2025. This initiative is organized with the support of Boston University’s Pardee School of Global Studies, which will host a series of book talks, and Harvard Law School’s Institute for Global Law & Policy, which will host the paper series.

The call is open to all scholars, covering all areas of international law and all periods of history. Because this initiative aims to build a community of scholars in the Boston area, preference will be given to those who can present in person.  To be considered, please email a copy of your submission to mamolea@bu.edu by Dec. 31, 2024.

Contact Professor Andrei Mamolea (mamolea@bu.edu) for more info.

Tuesday, 19 November 2024

CALL FOR PAPERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS: "Among Empires: Transimperial Circulation of Political Models and Scientific Knowledge. The Case of Four “Latecomers” (Germany, Italy, Belgium, and Japan), 1880s-1940s" (Università di Napoli Federico II, DEADLINE: 30 November 2024)

Over the last three decades at least, historians of different orientations have striven to overcome the nation-state as the unit of analysis to instead highlight the global dimension of phenomena, establish comparisons, or analyze the intersections and interconnections between different political entities. The attempt to apply this approach to empires has led to the development of a ‘transimperial’ research agenda, which focuses on spaces of intersections, encounters, and clashes of colonial rulers and anti-colonial actors within and across empires and brings under the same analytical framework competition, cooperation, and connectivity. In the transimperial approach, the comparison has been intended more as a historical object of investigation than as a method of historiography. Through the ‘politics of comparison,’ different historical actors observed and assessed other empires’ ideas and practices, aiming to emulate, reject, or mix them and giving place to new models of colonial policies.

We seek original contributions that, through the lens of the politics of comparison, focus on four latecomer empires, namely Germany, Italy, Belgium, and Japan – the case of the United States which also falls within this chronology is not part of our project – that started their colonial expansion at the end of the nineteenth century. In these countries and their colonies and protectorates, heated debates took place around the search for (historical or current foreign) models, and politicians, activists, and intellectuals often demanded the transimperial circulation of colonial knowledge, be it legal, political, or scientific.

In particular, we are interested in two distinct yet bordering fields:

 Models of colonial policies from a global perspective: for example, the debate on direct/indirect rule, regimes of belonging (citizenship, colonial subjecthood), education policies targeted at colonial subjects, co-optation in the colonial administration of local peoples, etc.

 Transimperial circulation of colonial knowledge in scientific fields such as medicine, agronomy, anthropology, legal culture, etc.

Selected scholars will be invited to present their research either in individual seminars or larger workshops that will take place in 2025 at the University of Naples Federico II or the University of Eastern Piedmont (Italy). The organization will fully reimburse the scholars coming from Europe; in other cases, it will assess on a case-by-case basis.

Papers will then be published as contributions in a peer-reviewed collective publication in English edited by the group working on the project “Imperial Entanglements: Latecomer Colonial Empires and the “Politics of Comparison” (1880s-1940s)” (PRIN 2022), a project jointly funded by the Italian government and the European Union (see www.imperialentanglements.it)

Applicants should submit:

1. an abstract of their paper of about 500 words

2. a short biography (no more than 300 words)

Email: imperialentanglements2022@gmail.com

Deadline: 30 November 2024

Acceptances will be sent by December 2024

Consult the project organizer's website "Imperial Entanglements" for more info.

Monday, 6 May 2024

CALL FOR PAPERS: Legal Histories of Empire IV: Empires in Touch (University of Toronto, 10-12 July 2025, DEADLINE: 31 August 2024)

Source: LHBE

Call For Papers 

Legal Histories of Empire IV 

Empires in Touch 

St Michael’s College, University of Toronto 

July 10-12, 2025 

Law in Empire. Law among Empires. We invite papers that consider how law has worked within empires at different times and places, how it has worked at the contact points between empires, and how imperial subjects have attempted to work law to their advantage. Law has facilitated, constituted, and enabled connections. People and societies have both suffered and benefitted from the uncertainties produced as empires have spread, imposed themselves on local populations, and competed with each other. Legal ideas have moved with people who had legal training and people without it. Institutions have formed and reformed, succeeded, failed, and produced intended and unintended consequences. In this fourth Legal Histories of Empire conference, we seek to explore these movements and connections, including the construction of illegality and non-legality. We hope to bring together historians working in different legal traditions and with a range of different sources to reveal the threads that have bound, ordered, and separated different empires, places, laws and legal traditions across the globe. 

Please send abstracts to LHE2025conference@uts.edu.au by 31 August 2024. Acceptances will be sent by the middle of October 2024. We are pursuing avenues to allow us to provide funding for travel, especially for graduate students and scholars from the Global South. Those interested in seeking funding should sign up for updates from our website, lhbe.org. 

Format: Chiefly in-person. We may have some limited capacity for online participation. Please indicate on your abstract whether your participation is contingent on the availability of online participation.

Personal information: For each participant (presenter, chair, or commentator), please submit: 1) Biographical details of no more than 150 words; 2) Where, and in what timezone, you will be in July 2025 if you are not physically in Toronto. 

Individual papers: If you are submitting an individual paper, please submit an abstract of no more than 200 words. Panels (of no more than 4 speakers: a chair and/or commentator can be included): If you are submitting a panel, please include: 1) A panel abstract of no more than 150 words; and 2) Individual paper abstracts of no more than 200 words. 

Streams: We anticipate having streams in the program on the following themes, coordinated by the scholars listed below. If your proposal is to a particular stream please indicate that clearly in your abstract. 

Illegality in Empire: Dr David Chan Smith 

The American Empire: Dr Sam Erman 

Empire in Oceania: Dr Mary Mitchell 

Law in Africa: Dr Yolanda Osondu 

Legal Transfer in the Common Law World: Prof Stefan Vogenauer and Dr Donal Coffey 

Comparing Empires: Judicial Institutions and Legal Actors: Prof Heikki Pihlajamäki


Consult the CfP or the website of the Legal Histories of Empire.

Tuesday, 30 April 2024

CALL FOR PAPERS: Dollar Hegemony, State Sovereignty And International Order: An International Workshop (University of New South Wales, 5-6 December 2024, DEADLINE: 1 July 2024)

Description:

During the past decade, it has become obvious that economic interconnectedness did not bring forth frictionless international relations as many liberal theorists had predicted. To the contrary, the fact that economic integration has been profoundly uneven has enabled the weaponisation of asymmetrical economic relations for the achievement of geopolitical and/or economic goals (Whyte 2022; Farrell 2023). The weaponisation of the unique international role of the US dollar is one of the most consequential examples of this trend. For instance, in the period since 2001, US sanctions designations have expanded by an extraordinary 933%. In the context of Russia’s war in Ukraine, dollar hegemony made it possible to freeze Russia’s foreign reserves and expel the country from the SWIFT payments system and US correspondent banking. Many states, including geopolitical rivals of the US such as China, understand this reality as a direct threat to their sovereign rights and interests and have been debating possible solutions, such as the introduction of central bank digital currencies and/or the creation of alternative mechanisms of payments clearing and financial messaging (Eichengreen 2022).

The intertwining between dollar hegemony and private money creation puts additional pressures on state sovereignty, as functions with profound and direct effects on the organisation of public life, such as money creation and credit allocation, are carried out by private institutions. Lawyers and political theorists alike have produced useful elaborations on the effects of dollar hegemony and public money on monetary sovereignty (Pistor 2017; Murau & van’t Klooster 2023). What remains relatively under-explored is the conceptual and practical challenges posed by dollar hegemony to state sovereignty more broadly, beyond the confines of monetary sovereignty. In other words, more work remains to be done on the tensions between state sovereignty, a globalised capitalist economy, and the economic unevenness that hegemonic currencies embody (Tzouvala 2024).

To this end, we seek contributions from economists, IR scholars, political theorists, historians, sociologists and lawyers to explore this important question as well as its theoretical and practical implications. We are interested, amongst other issues, in papers exploring:

1) the material and ideological foundations of dollar hegemony and their effects on state sovereignty and international order;

2) the distributional impacts of dollar hegemony both between states and between classes/factions of classes;

3) the legal rules and infrastructures that enable and challenge dollar hegemony;

4) the historical evolution of dollar hegemony;

5) the interplay between dollar hegemony, private money creation and financial capitalism;

6) institutional and political alternatives to dollar hegemony.

7) public and private experiments with digital currencies and their consequences for state sovereignty.

8) the implications of dollar hegemony and challenges to it for unilateral sanctions.

9) the geopolitics of dollar hegemony;

10) the mutually-sustaining relationship between US militarism and dollar hegemony.

We will explore these and other urgent question in a two-day workshop that will take place on the 5th and 6th of December 2024 at the University of New South Wales (Sydney, Australia). If interested, please send us an abstract of no more than 400 words and a short bio of no more than 50 words by the 1st of July 2024 at dollarandsovereignty@gmail.com. Limited funding may be available for speakers who do not have access to institutional funding.

Confirmed speakers include: Professor Melinda Cooper (Australian National University), Professor Mona Ali (State University of New York – New Paltz), Professor Will Bateman (Australian National University), Dr Ilias Alami (University of Cambridge), Professor Benton Heath (Temple University), Professor Shahar Hameiri (University of Queensland), Prof. David Blaazer (University of New South Wales), Professor Ryan Mitchell (Chinese University of Hong Kong), Dr Kanad Bagchi (University of Amsterdam).

Organisers: Dr Jessica Whyte (University of New South Wales), Dr Ntina Tzouvala (Australian National University). The event is co-sponsored by the ANU Capitalism Studies Network and the Australian Research Council Future Fellowship project Economic Sanctions After the Cold War (FT230100697).

Monday, 12 February 2024

CALL FOR PAPERS: 19th ESIL Annual Conference, IG History of International Law Pre-conference Workshop, "Historical Perspectives on Technological Change and International Law" (4 September, 2024, Vilnius, DEADLINE: 22 March 2024)

 


2024 ESIL Annual Conference Technological Change and International Law

Call for Papers:

Historical Perspectives on Technological Change and International Law

The ESIL Interest Group on the History of International Law cordially invites submissions of papers for its upcoming workshop centered on the theme “Historical Perspectives on Technological Change and International Law”. This gathering seeks to unravel the mysteries of technological evolution and its enduring legacy upon the edifice of international law.

We are intrigued by the historical development of various technologies across different spatial and temporal contexts within international law. All papers that delve into the debates concerning technological change in international law or explore the influence of technological change on international law are warmly welcomed.

Centuries have witnessed the inexorable march of technological innovation, each stride leaving an indelible mark on the canvas of international law. Technological change – whatever that may be, but as reasonably defined by an author - has impacted international law, just as international law has responded and evolved in the wake of new technological advancements. New disciplines and fields emerged, and old doctrines and theories disappeared. Novel technologies even prompt the emergence of entirely “new” fields of international law, such as international labor law, international environmental law, and air and space law, contributing to the so-called fragmentation of international law.

History is rife with examples and case studies illustrating the intricate interplay between technology and international law. With regard to the law on the use of force, the requirement for a formal declaration of war has been undermined by the advancement of telecommunications. Technological advancements in weaponry (e.g. chemical and nuclear weapons) have reshaped international humanitarian law. Similarly, the law of the seas has adjusted for innovations in ship-building and seafaring technologies (maps, cartography, GPS). Technology also affects the way and extent to which states project their powers. The limit of three nautical miles no longer defines the limit of the territorial sea now that coastal batteries can shoot beyond this range. The industrial revolution also caused international law to evolve. The inventions of the telegraph and railway required new commercial arrangements, enabled  the expansion of colonialism, and caused a surge of Western investments abroad. For example, in the mid-19th century, the industrial extraction of sugar from beets in Western Europe distorted the international sugar trade for decades, leading to the conclusion of dozens of treaties. Sometimes, an invention causes entirely new fields of international law to emerge. The airplane and space exploration created the need for aerospace law. But sometimes, too, international law fails to catch up with technological changes. For example, the Hague Convention on Explosives from Balloon in 1907 failed to become a general prohibition against aerial bombardments. Such failures to address technological change are equally important moments in the history of international law.

In reviewing the history of technological changes and international law, authors are encouraged to engage in discussions evaluating how international law has both succeeded and failed to accommodate and regulate technological changes. We welcome papers from all methodological perspectives, as long as they address technology and the history of international law.

Papers could address any of the following topics, but also any topic that addresses technological change (reasonably defined by the author) and the history of international law:

        Governance, preservation, and dissemination of knowledge in international legal history

        The role of international regulation in the rise of new technologies

        The influence of new technologies on human rights, both advancing and undermining

        The impact of technological changes on broader socio-political and sovereign processes

        How technological changes have affected the development and codification of international law

        The influence of technological changes on the law of treaties and state responsibility

        The effects of technological changes on international adjudication

        The constitutionalization of international law in response to technological changes

        The emergence of technology-specific international law

        The impact of technological changes on the laws of war, peace, the use of force, and arms control

        How technologies have shaped concepts of sovereignty

        The appearance or disappearance of disciplines, principles, and concepts within international law due to technological changes

        Case studies of failures to foresee and regulate technological changes in international law.

        The impact of inventions like the steam engine, railways, and telegraph on international law

We are particularly interested in papers that engage with non-Western perspectives on the historical perspectives on technological change and international law. We welcome submissions from scholars and practitioners at all stages of their careers, and particularly encourage submissions from early-career scholars and scholars from underrepresented regions and perspectives.

The Interest Group is unable to provide funding for travel and accommodation. Selected speakers will be expected to bear the costs of their own travel and accommodation. Some ESIL travel grants and ESIL carers' grants will be available to offer partial financial support to speakers who have exhausted other potential sources of funding.

Please see the ESIL website for all relevant information about the 19th Annual Conference. The Interest Group workshop is open to ESIL members, and all participants are required to register for the Annual Conference. There will be an option to register just for one day to attend the workshop; however, all participants are warmly invited to attend the entire event.

Selected speakers should indicate their interest in being considered for the ESIL Early-Career Scholar Prize, if they meet the eligibility conditions as stated on the ESIL website. The ESIL Secretariat must be informed of all selected speakers who wish to be considered for the Prize before 30 April.

Submissions should include an abstract of no more than 500 words, a short bio of the author(s), and contact information, in Word (not PDF). Abstracts should be submitted by the 22nd of March, 5 pm (CET) to anastasia.hammerschmied@univie.ac.at. The abstract and bio should be separated to allow for anonymous review by the convenors. The workshop will take place on the 4th of September (time slot TBA), and will provide an opportunity for participants to engage in a critical discussion of their research and to receive feedback from other scholars and practitioners. Remote participation will be possible, but in-person presence is highly preferred.

Convenors

Anastasia Hammerschmied – Florenz Volkaert - Jaanika Erne – Sze Hong Lam (Ocean) 

Wednesday, 22 November 2023

CALL FOR PAPERS: Historical Networks Research Conference, "Visualization" (University of Lausanne, 8-10 July 2024, DEADLINE: 31 January 2024)

Description:

The Historical Network Research community is very pleased to announce the call for papers for the Historical Networks Research conference 2024 which will take place at the University of Lausanne (Switzerland), from Monday 8 July until Wednesday 10 July, 2024.

Historical networks

The phenomena studied by the historical sciences are, by their very nature, complex situations: they involve, for example, interwoven personal relationships, collective dynamics that structure social and cultural space, or political and economic systems that operate at local and global levels. The network metaphor is frequently used to describe this entanglement. In recent decades, however, historians have begun to think about ways of formalizing this approach, appropriating the concepts and tools of graph theory to provide a new perspective on archives. The application of formal network analysis to history is now a highly fertile field of experimentation and research. It can be used to analyze the geographical logics of major circulation networks, to highlight brokers in affiliation networks, to compile family trees to reveal their points of contact, to study the occurrences and co-occurrences of concepts in serial texts, to show the evolution of personal social networks, etc. And through a great deal of empirical work, the specific features that historical disciplines bring to network science become apparent: particular attention to the modeling of data that is often incomplete and uncertain, the need to take account of temporality in all its finesse, the necessity to find a language that allows mathematical results to be interpreted in a qualitative narrative.

In 2009, following a workshop dedicated to the application of social network analysis to history, a small community of practice, the Historical Network Research community, was created. It evolved into a series of workshops and then an international conference, of which the present edition is the 9th to date, after conferences in Hamburg, Ghent, Lisbon, Turku, Brno, Luxembourg and Mainz. 2013 saw the creation of the HNR Collective Bibliography, a central tool for sharing the community’s scientific output. In 2017, the first issue of JHNR, the Journal of Historical Network Research, was published, allowing everyone to share their research in Open Access. Other resources include a YouTube channel with recorded lectures and a newsletter.

Conference focus: Visualization

Network visualization is often the first thing to be seen, whether it’s an illegible but colorful node-link diagram, an elaborate sociogram, an austere matrix or a fancy flow map. Because of our discomfort with basing our interpretation on an object apparently built on somewhat subjective foundations, because they are very likely to be influenced by a graphic bias, we often relegate visualizations to a minor role in our exploratory approaches, preferring the cold (apparent) scientificity of graph metrics. But just because we see naive uses of network visualization doesn’t mean it can’t be a highly effective tool for understanding, exploring and communicating our research data. One of the ambitions of the conference is therefore to question our use of network visualization in history, a concern that will be reflected in particular in the workshops and keynotes.

Note that the HNR conference is open to all subjects involving network analysis in historical disciplines, so the thematic emphasis of this 2024 edition has no impact on the selection of contributions. The only effect will be that an image will be requested for each paper (after the review phase, if not included in the submitted abstract) to create a gallery that will be displayed during the conference to spark discussion about our network visualization practices.

Topics

For our 2024 conference, we welcome contributions discussing any historical period and geographical area. Authors may be historians, linguists, librarians, archaeologists, art historians, computer scientists, social scientists as well as scholars from other disciplines working with historical data. Topics may include, but are not limited to:Applications of network analysis to history, art history, ancient history, intellectual history, economic history, social history, media history, political history, history of religions, biography, public history, micro-history, postcolonial history, global history, archaeology, literary history, cultural history, etc.
Analysis of specific network types, such as geospatial networks, temporal and dynamic networks, bipartite networks, multi-layer networks, multiplex networks, etc.
Methodological contributions concerning the applicability of network analysis to history, including, for example, modeling, ontologies, linked data, the use of graph metrics, visual network analysis, etc.
Pedagogical contributions, presenting teaching scenarios, literacy questions, software or feature presentations, interfaces, etc.

Formats

Long papers

Long papers consist of a 20-minute presentation followed by 10 minutes of discussion, and are intended to present comprehensive research. An abstract of 500-1000 words is required, including at least 3 citations. It should contain a description of the paper’s subject and research questions, an overview of the data used and methods employed, a discussion of the research results and possibly the wider implication for network analysis in history.

Short papers

Short papers consist of a 10-minute presentation followed by 5 minutes of discussion, and are intended to present research in progress. An abstract of 300-500 words is required, including at least 3 citations. It should contain a brief description of the subject and the research questions, an overview of the data used and the methods employed, a discussion of any results or questions still open at this stage.

Submission guidelines

Abstracts must be submitted via the conference management platform (https://hnr2024.sciencesconf.org/) by January 31, 2024.

The author (or corresponding author in the case of multi-authored papers) must create an account on the platform and then fill in the form, copying the abstract in full text (no PDF or other attachments).

Abstracts can be written in English or French.

Citations should use the Chicago Manual of Style 17th Edition Author Date style (author-date in the text, then full reference at the end).

Including an image in the abstract is encouraged to allow a general discussion of our network visualization practices. If, for any reason, the submitted version does not contain any, authors of accepted papers will be invited to add an image and caption at a later stage. Abstracts and images will then be published on the conference website ahead of the event and archived in a book of abstracts on Zenodo.

Authors’ presence at the conference

Although it is possible to follow the conference via streaming, it is nevertheless an on-site event. By submitting a paper, authors are aware that at least one person will need to be in Lausanne to present it.

Important dates

31.01.2024 deadline for submissions

29.02.2024 notification of acceptance/rejection

01.03.2024 registration opening

30.06.2024 last possible registration for participants

8-10.07.2024 conference

31.08.2024 invitation of selected articles to JHNR
                                    
                                                More information with HNR.

Tuesday, 21 November 2023

CALL FOR PAPERS: "Arguing over Empire: Hugo Grotius, European Expansionism and Slavery" (University of Amsterdam, 7 June 2024, DEADLINE: 15 January 2024)

 Call for papers

Arguing over Empire: Hugo Grotius, European Expansionism and Slavery

Location: University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Law Hub

Date: June 7th, 2024

Key-note: Prof. John Cairns (University of Edinburgh)

Workshop Theme

The workshop ‘Arguing over Empire: Hugo Grotius, European Expansionism and Slavery’ is part of a series of conferences organized by the Grotiana Foundation preceding the celebration in 2025 of the 400th anniversary of Grotius’ opus magnum On the Law of War and Peace (De iure belli ac pacis) published in 1625. Previous conferences in this series have dealt with, e.g., ‘Grotius’ Contribution to Commercial and Maritime Law’ and ‘Non-consequential theories of strict liability in historical perspective.’ The workshop is co-organized by the Paul Scholten Centre for Jurisprudence of the University of Amsterdam in cooperation with the Amsterdam Law Hub, with Grotiana, and with the ‘Servus-project’ funded by the NWO.

Hugo Grotius (1583-1645) is generally regarded as one of the ‘founding fathers of modern international law.’ However, he was also one of the early architects of Dutch colonial and imperial rule in the East Indies. Between 1604 and 1615, he served the Dutch East India Company (VOC) as a legal advisor and political lobbyist. In this capacity, he wrote memoranda and policy documents providing legal and political justifications for the Company’s commercial and military activities in monsoon Asia. In 1604, Grotius was commissioned by the VOC to write a treatise to defend the seizure of a Portuguese vessel off the coast of Johor (present-day Singapore). In the only published chapter of the treatise during his lifetime, titled The Free Sea (Mare Liberum), he argued that the Portuguese violated the natural rights of the Dutch by preventing them from sailing to the East Indies and engaging in trade with indigenous populations. As judicial recourse was lacking, even a private trading company such as the VOC could wage a ‘just war’ to enforce its natural rights. Grotian thinking about natural law, contracts and just war thus legitimized Dutch expansion overseas and the dispossession of the native.

Grotius’ On the Law of War and Peace is another case in point. Although the author was an exile in Paris by then, he relied on many years of practical experience as a VOC advisor and lobbyist in writing his magnum opus. In On the Law of War and Peace, he elaborates the views presented in On the Law of Prize and Booty by conceptualizing the natural rights to travel and free passage, the rights to settle in uninhabited lands and use natural resources, and the right to free trade between ‘persons at a distance’, invoked by Europeans to demand access to non-European markets and territories. On the Law of War and Peace also provides a legal justification of slavery as part of natural law and the law of nations. In the author’s view, those who are defeated in a just war can be enslaved under the law of nations, while human beings may also ‘voluntarily’ submit to slavery under natural law. Moreover, the children of the enslaved inherit the unfree status of their parents according to On the Law of War and Peace.

The aim of this workshop is to explore the many connections between Grotius’ thinking about natural law and the law of nations and his full-throated defense of European expansion overseas and slavery. We invite contributors to critically examine these connections by addressing the imperialist and colonialist readings of Grotius’ theory of natural rights, just war, property,

unequal treaties and alliances, monopoly contracts, slavery, and the role of private actors (e.g., trading companies). We specifically welcome contributions that engage with the following questions:

· What were non-European responses to, or engagement with, such imperialist and colonialist readings? For instance, how did East-Indian rulers receive and interpret, or indeed resist, Grotian conceptualizations of natural rights and (monopoly) contracts? Were alternative conceptualizations proposed to contest Grotius’ justification of slavery?

· What was the relationship between the ‘Grotian tradition of international law’ and colonial practices in the early modern and modern eras? How were Grotian discourses of international law used to justify colonial warfare, native dispossession and slavery in the Americas, Asia and Africa between the 17th and 20th centuries? For instance, how did Grotian ideas about natural law, freedom of trade and humanitarianism (protecting the oppressed from inhumane treatment) contribute to justifying colonial warfare, and what role did private trading companies play in these wars?

In addressing questions like these, we seek to understand the ambivalent relation between, on the one hand, Grotius’ innovate contributions to international law and humanitarianism, and, on the other hand, the use of his concepts to justify (Western) colonialism and imperialism.

Conditions

A paper proposal of max. 300 words should be sent to j.giltaij@uva.nl and m.dewilde@uva.nl. The deadline for submissions is January 15th, 2024. Applicants will be notified by February 26th, 2024 whether their paper proposal has been accepted or not. The organizing committee will use two criteria in the selection of paper proposals: intellectual quality and potential fit with the workshop theme. The workshop is meant to be interdisciplinary and small-scale, allowing plenty of time for discussion and interaction. Available slots are limited. However, the committee’s aim is to invite speakers from diverse backgrounds (age, geography, gender, and career status). The workshop takes place on location. Speakers who are unable to participate in person may do so online. Unfortunately, the organizing committee is not able to cover the costs of accommodation or travel. Selected speakers are requested to obtain funding themselves. Each speaker will be given a 30-minutes time slot, which includes 20 minutes for presentation and 10 minutes for questions and discussion. Our aim is to publish (revised versions of) the presented papers in a leading international journal related to Grotius, the history of international law, or the history of colonialism.

Organizing Committee

Inge Van Hulle (Leuven University and Max Planck Institute, Frankfurt am Main)

Martine van Ittersum (University of Dundee)

Jacob Giltaij (University of Amsterdam)

Jeroen Vervliet (Max Planck Institute, Luxembourg)

Marc de Wilde (University of Amsterdam)